|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Osmosis | 617 | Incentivise APT/USDT Supercharged Pools | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Gitopia | 5 | Signalling Proposal for Restructuring Ecosystem Rewards for Platform Incentives | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Gitopia | 4 | Signalling Proposal for Reforming the Inflation Policy for Long-Term Sustainability | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Shentu | 22 | New Bech32 Address Prefix "shentu" | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Kujira | 462 | Upgrade Fuzion Plasma (Otc) Smart Contract to v1.2.1 and Flows v1.0.1 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Kujira | 461 | Blend - Instantiate Fixed CW3 Multisig for fees | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 615 | Whitelist Transmuter Contract and CW Pool module | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Agoric | 42 | 💎ATOM Airdrop ✅ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Sommelier | 78 | [SIPS-073] Real Yield BTC Cellar Incentives | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Akash | 229 | Adding Full Akash Support & Features to the Cosmos Metamask Snap | Link | Yes | We are very excited about MetaMask Snap integration for Cosmos chains. However, the current proposal is lacking in some important details. First of all, is it going to be a public good to all Cosmos chains or a pay-to-play product? Second, what is the total budget? It does not need to have precise line-items, but the community should be aware of the total ballpark budget. Third, we would like the team to lay out the grants already received (believe it received ATOMAccelerator funding) and grants that the team is still planning to apply on different chains. Ideally, this should match or be slightly above the budget. This is needed for full transparency to the wider interchain community. [Edit: We have revised our vote to Yes after understanding that this is an Akash-specific proposal and the team does not have any plans for more public proposals prior to launch.] |