|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stargaze | 171 | ⚡Layerzero x Cosmos airdrop⚡ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Juno | 300 | ⚡Layerzero x Cosmos airdrop⚡ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| XPLA | 6 | Parameter change for participation of more validators from 50 to 80. | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Stargaze | 170 | Stargaze Airdrop ✅ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Gitopia | 3 | Update the frozen IBC client between Gitopia and Osmosis | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Juno | 299 | Juno Airdrop ✅ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Evmos | 147 | Build a Decentralized Derivatives Exchange on EVMOS | Link | No | We vote No for 3 reasons. First, such proposal should go through the already established grant program. The proposer mentioned on CW that the grant amount is too small. To this, we think that the team can carve out a large percentage of project tokens for itself. This way, the team will be fairly compensated if the project is successful. Second, we already have a few AMM protocols on Evmos. Rather than having a new one, we should devote resources to help the existing ones to build out new features. Third, the proposal team is relatively new to Evmos and we do not see a strong track record or commitment to the ecosystem yet. |
| Osmosis | 524 | Layerzero airdrop⚡ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |
| Teritori | 34 | Upgrade to v1.4.0 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Stargaze | 169 | Layerzero airdrop⚡ | Link | No With Veto | LOL! |