Governance Participation

Network
Proposal ID
Proposal
Explorer Link
Vote
Reason
Injective 194 Trade and Earn rewards allocation Link Yes LFG
CosmosHub 88 Increase the Community Pool Tax on the Cosmos Hub - Parameter Change Link Yes Cosmos Hub does not have enough value in community pool to compete for developers and projects in the interchain. Let's do this thing!
CosmosHub 89 Cosmos Ecosystem News Videos Link No We believe that educating and keeping all Cosmos ecosystem stakeholders is important. However, we do not believe that the quality of educational materials produced by the proposer is worthwhile for community funding.
CosmosHub 90 Community Health research, analytics, and benchmarking Link Yes Cosmos Hub has a few contentious props recently. The main reason is that the community is not aligned in the hub's future direction. RnDAO offers a research framework to understand the community health and will open source the data collection tool for $30K.
Crescent 30 Confirm StakeLab and Stakin as Crescent Liquid Staking Validators Link Yes Congrats to both StakeLab and Stakin!
Crescent 31 Migration to pair farming of Crescent v3 Link Yes LFG
Crescent 32 Re-enable IBC Client to Terra Classic Link Yes LFG
Evmos 88 Common Sense Setting: No Payment For Unsolicited Services Link No In general, we are in favor of putting up more guardrails against opportunistic grant proposal shoppers. However, the proposer of this proposal has taken an absolutist approach and been unreasonably hostile towards dissenters in the Discord chat. As a result, the content of the proposal is not fully flushed out, and it contains language like “common sense” and “moral independence” that essentially put dissenters in a morally inferior position. We think the author can amend the language and request feedback from the community in a new discussion.
Evmos 89 Register ERC20 for COMDEX (CMDX) Link Yes LFG
Evmos 91 Register ERC20 for COMPOSITE (CMST): Stablecoin of Harbor Protocol Link Yes LFG