Governance Participation

Network
Proposal ID
Proposal
Explorer Link
Vote
Reason
Evmos 134 [ECP-2B] Formalizing and Funding of the Community Mod & Support Workstream Link No While we agree with the foundational layer established on Prop 83, we believe it is too early for Evmos chain to bureaucratize the DAO functions. The project is still in its early days and many processes are still fluid. We do not think it is wise to enact such workstream at this stage. We voted "No" on Prop 113 and will continue to vote "No" on such follow-on proposals. Of course, if any of such proposals pass, we will whole-heartedly support the team since that's what the community wants.
Quicksilver 4 Upgrade quicksilverd to v1.2.4 Link Yes LFG!
Osmosis 448 Signalling Proposal for OSMO/MARS incentives Link Yes Mars and Osmosis have tight partnership so it is strategically important for Mars to be successful.
Osmosis 449 Re-evaluation of NGM/OSMO Incentives Link Yes Please just remove incentives from the NGM pool as NGM might be NGMI.
Kujira 277 The Senate multisig initial funding Link Yes LFG
Kujira 278 BOW Staking: Move GRAV rewards Link Yes LFG
Kujira 279 [revised] Migrate FIN Multi to v1.1.0 Link Yes LFG
Stargaze 127 Launchpad v2.1 - Vending Minter Link Yes LFG!
Stargaze 126 Launchpad v2.1 - SG721 Contract Link Yes LFG!
Crescent 203 USDC Airdrop ✅ Link No With Veto LOL