Governance Participation

Network
Proposal ID
Proposal
Explorer Link
Vote
Reason
Kujira 139 Deploy LOOP-USK FIN Market Link Yes LFG!
Juno 85 CORRECTED: Make JUNO Carbon Neutral by Purchasing Eco-Credits Link No While we support reducing carbon footprint as a climate-friendly validator, we fundamentally believe that it is wasteful of the collective effort to go chain-by-chain on an annual basis to solicit carbon credit. There must be a better way.
Evmos 107 Cancellation of Prop 45, Clarification of Laurel Project Role Link Yes We are so glad that this Laurel Project madness is almost over. Hehehe.
Juno 83 Make JUNO Carbon Neutral by Purchasing Eco-Credits Link No While we support reducing carbon footprint as a climate-friendly validator, we fundamentally believe that it is wasteful of the collective effort to go chain-by-chain on an annual basis to solicit carbon credit. There must be a better way.
Evmos 106 Consensus Test Link No With Veto SPAM!
Stride 11 Setting Stride's Roadmap for 2023 Link Yes These are a good list of the features and it is just a text proposal. Since we are still early in this phase of the project, it is up to the team to lead the development while using this Roadmap just as a reference. It is perfectly okay to deviate from this roadmap when we learn new info in this fast-developing field.
Kujira 138 Instantiate LOCAL Denom Wrapper. Link Yes LFG!
Evmos 105 Governance Consensus: Governance Immunity Link No With Veto We will continue to NWV on such spam proposals. "Only the chains that will pass proposals compatible with this one will have the legitimacy to enter common governance platforms for the InterChain." What does that even mean? The legitimacy of a chain is earned by good-faith actions from the community, and the legitimacy of a validator is ruined by the continuous spam proposals.
Evmos 104 Increase Developer Revenue from 50% to 95% Link Yes We need to get more dev projects on Evmos and this is a good way.
Stargaze 104 Incentivize STARS/USK farm on BOW for 3 months. Link Yes LFG!