|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comdex | 81 | Add Luna as Asset | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Evmos | 113 | [ECP-2A] Formalizing and Funding the Governance Council Workstream (Rev. 2) | Link | No | While we agree with the foundational layer established on Prop 83, we believe it is too early for Evmos chain to bureaucratize the DAO functions. The project is still in its early days and many processes are still fluid. We do not think it is wise to enact such workstream at this stage. |
| Comdex | 79 | Proposal to add liquidity mining incentives to cSwap pools : phase-7 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 416 | Regular Incentive adjustment for 2023-01-30 | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Osmosis | 412 | Update the Impacthub-3 client with Ixo-4 client to recover channel between Osmosis and Ixo | Link | Yes | LFG! |
| Stride | 28 | USDC Airdrop 🔥 | Link | No With Veto | lol |
| Stride | 27 | ATOM / LUNA Airdrop 🔥 | Link | No With Veto | lol |
| Terra | 4591 | Hermes Protocol | Community Grant for public goods development | Link | No | We vote No for two reasons. First, Hermes Protocol has no product-market fit. While it lists many features that it will develop, each feature already has at least one alternative fully built product that we can use. Second, while community-initiated developments are needed for many chains, Terra2 core team happens to be very good in product development themselves. The recent product announcements of Alliance, Feather, and InterChain Wallet are just a few example. If the community wants to initiate new developments, they should align the product vision with the core team, rather than submitting a vanilla version of a proposal like this one. |
| Stride | 25 | ATOM Airdrop for LUNA/LUNC/COSMOS holders ✅ | Link | No With Veto | lol |
| Stride | 26 | APTOS Airdrop for LUNA/LUNC/COSMOS holders ✅ | Link | No With Veto | lol |