Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kujira | 216 | Local Money Community Funding for Milestone 3 | Link | Yes | LFG |
Osmosis | 418 | Update Shentu IBC Client on Osmosis | Link | Yes | LFG |
Kujira | 215 | Deploy LINK-USK FIN Market | Link | Yes | LFG |
Juno | 125 | Fair and Equitable Distribution of Remaining Funds (corrected) | Link | No | DEXs on Juno faces an existential question: Do the builders truly believe that they can beat app-chain DEX like Osmosis? If not, then they will just be an arbitrage hunting ground until the incentives run out. The strategic alternative is to pursue a "regional" DEX strategy. It can provide liquidity between CW tokens and the native JUNO tokens to support projects on the ecosystem. This way, we do not directly compete with app-chain DEXs, who will likely never bother to list these "minor" tokens. We believe in this strategy. Therefore, incentives for JUNO/ATOM, JUNO/USDC, and JUNO/OSMO make no strategic sense. |
Juno | 124 | Fair and Equitable Distribution of Remaining Funds | Link | No | DEXs on Juno faces an existential question: Do the builders truly believe that they can beat app-chain DEX like Osmosis? If not, then they will just be an arbitrage hunting ground until the incentives run out. The strategic alternative is to pursue a "regional" DEX strategy. It can provide liquidity between CW tokens and the native JUNO tokens to support projects on the ecosystem. This way, we do not directly compete with app-chain DEXs, who will likely never bother to list these "minor" tokens. We believe in this strategy. Therefore, incentives for JUNO/ATOM, JUNO/USDC, and JUNO/OSMO make no strategic sense. |
Axelar | 34 | Axelar Airdrop ✅ | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
Crescent | 74 | USDC Airdrop 🔥 | Link | No With Veto | LOL |
CosmosHub | 97 | v8-Rho | Link | Yes | LFG! |
Gravity | 118 | Add CMDX Metadata to Gravity Bridge | Link | Yes | LFG |
Gravity | 119 | Add CMST Metadata to Gravity Bridge | Link | Yes | LFG |