|
Network
|
Proposal ID
|
Proposal
|
Explorer Link
|
Vote
|
Reason
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evmos | 110 | Encode Club's Evmos Grant Proposal | Link | Yes | This is a strong proposal. Evmos needs a grant proposal to support the growing developer ecosystem while freeing up the mental load required to evaluate funding proposals among the general token holders. Without an effective grant program, an endless stream o funding proposals will either cause the public voting fatigue, or devolve into a popularity contest among funding proposers, or both. None of the outcomes are ideal. We have known Encode Club since our early days as a validator on Polkadot/Kusama. They are professional and eager to support the ecosystem development in the blockchain space. |
| Evmos | 109 | New Evmos Liquidity Incentive and SpaceFi Whole Launching | Link | No | We applaud that SpaceFi team has been building on Evmos since Day 1 and has continued to ship products. However, we think that Evmos should focus on flagship DeFi projects with limited resources. So far, the team and the community are working to bring UniSwap to Evmos, which we wholeheartedly support. Teams like SpaceFi should continue to compete with product innovations, but we will vote "No" on this proposal to preserve the resources for big battles. |
| Evmos | 107 | Cancellation of Prop 45, Clarification of Laurel Project Role | Link | Yes | We are so glad that this Laurel Project madness is almost over. Hehehe. |
| Evmos | 106 | Consensus Test | Link | No With Veto | SPAM! |
| Evmos | 105 | Governance Consensus: Governance Immunity | Link | No With Veto | We will continue to NWV on such spam proposals. "Only the chains that will pass proposals compatible with this one will have the legitimacy to enter common governance platforms for the InterChain." What does that even mean? The legitimacy of a chain is earned by good-faith actions from the community, and the legitimacy of a validator is ruined by the continuous spam proposals. |
| Evmos | 104 | Increase Developer Revenue from 50% to 95% | Link | Yes | We need to get more dev projects on Evmos and this is a good way. |
| Evmos | 103 | Ratify Governance-Official Meanings for Yes, No, Abstain and NoWithVeto | Link | Yes | It pains us that this proposal is even necessary. But in a world spammed by the Laurel Project, we will do everything to stop this madness. |
| Evmos | 100 | Retroactive Payment for Public Goods (Evmos Development for 2022) | Link | No With Veto | Go away!!! |
| Evmos | 99 | Governance Consensus: No Criminal Decisions | Link | No With Veto | Please go away! |
| Evmos | 98 | Governance Consensus: Only Elected Officers May Represent the Will of the Chain | Link | No With Veto | This is getting ridiculous. We are strongly against governance proposal spams. |